ORR v. ORR


36 N.J. 236 (1961)

176 A.2d 241

ISABELLA HEULITT ORR AND LESTER M. HEULITT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. STANLEY M. ORR, DEFENDANT, AND STANLEY W. ORR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 18, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John C. Givens argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Smith, attorneys).

Mr. M. Raymond McGowan argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Barkalow, McGowan & Krusen, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

The issues in this case involve the applicability of the doctrine of Koplik v. C.P. Trucking Corp., 27 N.J. 1 (1958). Appeal was taken to the Appellate Division from the trial court's order granting a motion to dismiss the third and fourth counts of the complaint. In the former count, Isabella Heulitt Orr seeks to recover damages from her husband, the respondent, Stanley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases