MATTER OF HAAS v. COSTIGAN


31 Misc.2d 239 (1961)

In the Matter of Raymond N. Haas et al., Petitioners, v. George B. Costigan et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

October 10, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham Kaplan for petitioners. Marvin N. Suss for respondents.


MARIO PITTONI, J.

The respondents move, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the petition as insufficient on its face, and pursuant to rules 102, 103 and 90, not only to dismiss but also to strike certain paragraphs of the petition as conclusory, vague, indefinite and uncertain.

Paragraphs 11 and 12 are sufficient. Paragraph 11 states in part "that 162 signatories thereof were not, in fact, registered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases