1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 12 Wis.2d
  5. 12 Wis.2d 258 (1961)
 

COHN v. ZIPPEL

12 Wis.2d 258 (1961)

COHN, Trustee, Respondent, v. ZIPPEL and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 10, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Affeldt & Lichtsinn, and oral argument by Eldred Dede, all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Harry S. Sicula and Jack L. Goodsitt, both of Milwaukee.

BROADFOOT, J.

The attorneys for the plaintiff felt that orderly pleading required them to divide their cause of action into various periods of time. We do not agree with them. A reading of the complaint indicates that but one conspiracy is alleged. Averments in the separate causes of action state generally when and how the object of the conspiracy was allegedly carried out and that the plaintiff was damaged. There is only one subject of the action and that is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases