CATRONIO v. RODENHURST CHEVROLET


28 Misc.2d 234 (1961)

Joseph Catronio, Plaintiff, v. Rodenhurst Chevrolet et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County.

March 3, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cahn & Cahn for Rodenhurst Chevrolet, defendant. Jerome Scharoff for General Motors Corp., defendant. Malcolm L. Tillim for plaintiff.


THOMAS P. FARLEY, J.

Defendant Rodenhurst Chevrolet, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Rodenhurst", moves to dismiss the cross complaint of defendant General Motors Corp. for insufficiency and upon the ground that the same is not interposable under section 264 of the Civil Practice Act.

The complaint contains three separate causes of action. The first two causes of action are directed solely against Rodway, an auto and truck dealer, based on claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases