ROHNER ET UX v. NEVILLE


230 Or. 31 (1961)

365 P.2d 614

368 P.2d 391

ROHNER ET UX v. NEVILLE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions October 25, 1961.

Petition for rehearing denied January 31, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H.M. Weatherford, Albany, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Weatherford & Thompson, Albany.

Robert Mix, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GOODWIN, J.

Plaintiffs Rohner appeal from a decree denying their suit to quiet title to 51.9 acres of land. After trial, the court dismissed the suit because the complaint did not allege that the defendant was claiming an interest adverse to the plaintiffs. Such an allegation is required by ORS 105.605. Fildew v. Milner, 57 Or. 16, 20, 109 P 1092. It does not follow, however, that the suit was properly dismissed.

1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases