1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 103 N.H.
  5. 103 N.H. 152 (1961)
 

STATE v. FORNIER

No. 4883.

103 N.H. 152 (1961)

STATE v. NORBERT FORNIER.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided January 20, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General and William F. Cann, Assistant to the Attorney General (Mr. Cann orally), for the State.

Sweeney & Welts (Mr. Welts orally), for the defendant.

BLANDIN, J.

The defendant's underlying claim is that the State has failed "to identify sufficiently the [blood] sample analyzed by Miss Guptill as being the sample taken from the defendant." He asserts that all essential links in the chain of evidence leading from the sample analyzed to him were not established as required by our law. State v. Reenstierna, 101 N.H. 286. To determine the validity of this argument, it is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases