SCHONBERG v. PERRY

Docket No. 25088.

197 Cal.App.2d 53 (1961)

16 Cal. Rptr. 848

SAMI SCHONBERG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ANNA PERRY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

November 15, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Barnett Spivak for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jerome L. Ehrlich, Edgar F. Gross, Ball, Hunt & Hart and Joseph A. Ball for Defendant and Respondent.


VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from an order granting a motion for a new trial.

Although the pleadings are not part of the record on appeal we gather from the briefs that the action is one for damages for alleged fraud on the part of defendant, Anna Perry. The jury's verdict was for plaintiff. Defendant's motion for a new trial was granted on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases