CADY v. ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION CO.


12 Wis.2d 236 (1961)

CADY, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by John G. Nestingen of Spring Valley, and Kenneth Hayes of Hudson, and oral argument by Mr. Nestingen.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Robert R. Gavic of Spring Valley.


HALLOWS, J.

The problem presented divides itself into three parts: 1. Has Wisconsin the jurisdiction to tax such personal property? 2. Do the existing laws tax such property? 3. Is the town of Cady the proper assessment district?

It has been generally recognized that the state of the domicile of the owner may tax personal property where such property has not acquired a situs elsewhere for tax purposes. Van Dyke v. Tax Comm. (1940), 235 Wis. 128, 292...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases