PRINCETON UNIV. PRESS v. BOROUGH OF PRINCETON


35 N.J. 209 (1961)

172 A.2d 420

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George H. Barlow argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Katzenbach, Gildea & Rudner, attorneys; Mr. Albridge C. Smith 3rd, of counsel).

Mr. Peter T. Bacsik, on the brief and of counsel, argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Mr. John F. McCarthy, Jr., attorney).


The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

The issue before us is whether the property of Princeton University Press (hereafter referred to as the Press) is tax exempt within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6.

The Borough of Princeton assessed a tax for land, improvements and personalty for 1957. The Mercer County Board of Taxation denied petitioner's claim of exemption. This action was affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases