In this proceeding Richfield Oil Corporation attacks an order of the Public Utilities Commission directing it to cease and desist from constructing a pipeline to connect with its Mandalay pipeline, the operation of which we considered in Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Util. Com.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RICHFIELD OIL CORP. v. PUBLIC UTIL. COM.
55 Cal.2d 187 (1961)
358 P.2d 686
10 Cal. Rptr. 358
RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 24, 1961.
January 24, 1961.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mervyn W. Phelan, Ball, Hunt & Hart, Joseph A. Ball and Clark Heggeness for Petitioner.
William M. Bennett, Chief Counsel, Roderick B. Cassidy, Assistant Chief Counsel, Mary Moran Pajalich, Senior Counsel, Reginald L. Vaughan, Joseph R. Rensch, Milford Springer, William P. Gray and Herman F. Selvin for Respondents.
Charles A. Rummel and William L. Knecht as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.