HECKER v. CROWN MILLS


229 Or. 8 (1961)

365 P.2d 840

HECKER v. CROWN MILLS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 1, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip A. Levin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Pozzi, Levin & Wilson, Portland.

Kenneth E. Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey & Williamson and Roland F. Banks, Jr., Portland.

Before ROSSMAN, J., presiding, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, LUSK and BRAND, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Roger A. Hecker, from a judgment of the circuit court which dismissed his complaint and ruled that he take nothing. The judgment was based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. The action was predicated upon charges that the defendant, Crown Mills, through failure to exercise requisite care, injured the plaintiff. Crown Mills was not the plaintiff's employer; the latter was Portland Stevedoring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases