MATTER OF WENTWORTH (CATHERWOOD)


10 N.Y.2d 13 (1961)

In the Matter of the Claims of Edward J. Wentworth, Jr., et al., Respondents. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 25, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Samuel Stern and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant.

Robert A. Longman, Charles H. Tuttle and Daniel F. O'Connell for Edward J. Wentworth, Jr., and others, respondents.

Howard A. Levine for Nicola Pisotti and others, respondents.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER concur with Judge FULD; Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the determination of the Industrial Commissioner upon the ground that a restricted interpretation of the word "establishment" as used in subdivision 1 of section 592 of the Labor Law was not intended by the Legislature and would operate to defeat the purpose of the statute.


FULD, J.

In this case, as in Matter of Curatalo (Catherwood) (supra, p. 10), the Industrial Commissioner also appeals by our permission.

The claimants were employed as carpenters and timbermen by Tully & DiNapoli, Inc., a construction firm working on road construction projects in the New York City area. Their duties consisted of constructing wooden forms and performing other work in preparation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases