UNITED ADVERTISING CORP. v. BOROUGH OF METUCHEN


35 N.J. 193 (1961)

172 A.2d 429

UNITED ADVERTISING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF METUCHEN AND IRVING T. WOERNER, BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin J. Loftus argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Mr. Leon Semer, attorney; Mr. Sam Weiss, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff is engaged in the business of erecting, maintaining and leasing outdoor advertising signs. On or about January 25, 1960, it applied to the building inspector of Metuchen for permits to erect two billboards. Both of these were to be located on lands owned by the Pennsylvania Railroad and leased to plaintiff. The site of one of the signs was within the B-1 (business) district, and of the second, within the M-1 (manufacturing) district, as established...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases