JEWEL TEA CO. v. BLAMBLE

No. 50, September Term, 1961.]

227 Md. 1 (1961)

174 A.2d 764

JEWEL TEA CO., INC. v. BLAMBLE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 15, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Geppert and Hugh A. McMullen, with whom were Gunter and Geppert on the brief, for the appellant.

Simon F. Reilly, with whom was Peter J. Carpenti on the brief, for the appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.


SYBERT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal raises the question whether, in a Workmen's Compensation case, the trial court properly permitted the jury to determine, on the basis of subjective lay testimony, that the employee was 100 per cent disabled when all the expert medical testimony in the case was to the contrary. From a judgment entered on the jury's verdict of 100 per cent disability, the employer appeals.

The facts are undisputed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases