1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 188 Cal.App.2d
  5. 188 Cal.App.2d 29 (1961)
 

OMNIBUS INVESTMENT CORP. v. MAAG

Docket No. 24618.

188 Cal.App.2d 29 (1961)

10 Cal. Rptr. 178

OMNIBUS INVESTMENT CORPORATION (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HENRY H. MAAG, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

January 3, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin M. Rosendahl and Andrew J. Weisz for Appellant.

Edward M. Raskin and Gerald E. Lichtig for Respondent.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

Plaintiff's appeal to the trial court to permit it to redeem from a sale under execution, after the statutory time for redemption had expired — presented in its second amended complaint — proving unsuccessful, it has appealed from the judgment that followed the order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. We, too, find the second amended complaint not to state a cause of action, and so are affirming...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases