THIEL v. BAHR CONSTRUCTION CO.


13 Wis.2d 196 (1961)

THIEL, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, v. BAHR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 4, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Dudley O. Emmert of Manitowoc.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by John C. Mayer and John E. Huberty, guardian ad litem, both of Manitowoc.


BROADFOOT, J.

The trial court denied the motion to strike for the reason that no authority was cited for the granting of the motion for the reasons stated therein. Attention was called to secs. 263.42, 263.43, and 263.44, Stats., with reference to when pleadings may be stricken. In any event, the same issue was raised by the demurrer.

It is true that the alleged violation of the safe-place statute, sec. 101.06, merely alleged another act of negligence on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases