1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 36 N.J.
  5. 36 N.J. 172 (1961)
 

STATE v. MURPHY

36 N.J. 172 (1961)

175 A.2d 622

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. FRANCIS MURPHY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION TO QUASH SUBPOENA TO WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, APPELLANT, AND FRANCIS MURPHY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 20, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert A. Pin argued the cause for appellant Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (Mr. William P. Sirignano and Mr. Irving Malchman, of the New York Bar, on the brief).

Mr. Harold Krieger argued the cause for defendant McNamara (Messrs. Krieger & Chodash, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Hession argued the cause for defendant Stevens (Messrs. O'Mara, Schumann, Davis & Lynch, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEINTRAUB, C.J.

The trial court ordered pretrial discovery of statements which defendants McNamara and Stevens gave the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (herein Commission). State v. Murphy, 63 N.J.Super. 188 (Cty. Ct. 1960). The order deals as well with notes or memoranda of examinations of defendants, but since no such papers exist, we are concerned only with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases