BURKE v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES


148 Conn. 33 (1961)

FRANCIS X. BURKE v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD ALFRED F. DECARLO v. BOARD OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 3, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isadore M. Mackler, with whom was Theodore Godlin, for the appellant (defendant in each case).

John M. Hanrahan, with whom were Richard W. Martin and, on the brief, Richard H. Fitzmaurice, for the appellee (plaintiff) in the first case.

Maurice J. Buckley, for the appellee (plaintiff) in the second case.

BALDWIN, C. J., KING, MURPHY, MELLITZ and SHEA, JS.


BALDWIN, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from judgments of the Court of Common Pleas overruling the action of the defendant in rejecting an amendment of the zoning map of Stamford after the amendment was adopted by the zoning board. The plaintiffs own premises located within the area changed by the amendment.

For a better understanding of the issues involved, a review of the charter and statutory provisions relating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases