PYTER v. KRAMP CONSTRUCTION CO.


15 Wis.2d 160 (1961)

PYTER, Appellant, v. KRAMP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 28, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Roman H. Papka and Kersten & McKinnon, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Kenan J. Kersten.

For the respondent there was a brief by Bloomquist & Lemke, attorneys, and C. Donald Straub of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Straub.


FAIRCHILD, J.

Plaintiff does not contend here that Klemm was one of the persons designated by statute to receive service binding on the corporation.1

Plaintiff does argue that he is entitled to a one-year extension of the period of limitations and that Klemm had apparent authority to accept service.

1. Extension of period of limitations. Plaintiff contends that Klemm knowingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases