FAIRCHILD, J.
Plaintiff does not contend here that Klemm was one of the persons designated by statute to receive service binding on the corporation.
Plaintiff does argue that he is entitled to a one-year extension of the period of limitations and that Klemm had apparent authority to accept service.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.