MEYER v. MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INS. CO.


13 Wis.2d 156 (1961)

MEYER, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs, v. MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Defendants and Respondents: HERMAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 7, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Cape & Schellinger, attorneys, and Stanley F. Schellinger of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Stanley F. Schellinger.

For the respondents Meyer there was a brief by Silverstein, Warshafsky & Rotter of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert Silverstein.

For the respondents Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company and Ronald Meidl there was a brief by Hayes & Hayes of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Hanlin J. Hayes.


HALLOWS, J.

On this appeal, two questions are raised: (1) Did the court err in directing a verdict for Meidl and his insurer absolving Meidl from negligence under the emergency doctrine, and (2) did the court err in not admitting in evidence a written statement taken by an employee of the Herman Mutual Insurance Company from Johnson?

A review of the pertinent facts is necessary. Highway 41 at the point of impact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases