SHAW v. ABRAHAM

No. 9421.

12 Utah 2d 150 (1961)

364 P.2d 7

GRANT SHAW AND ILA SHAW, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. RUE ABRAHAM AND GLORIA ABRAHAM, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND MARY J. ABRAHAM, BEN BOYCE AND GADDIS INVESTMENT COMPANY, A UTAH CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANT. MARY J. ABRAHAM, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT. v. RUE ABRAHAM AND GLORIA ABRAHAM, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS, GRANT SHAW AND ILA SHAW, DEFENDANTS AND RESPONDENTS.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 22, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olsen & Chamberlain, Richfield, Herbert B. Maw, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Dwight L. King, Salt Lake City, for respondents.


HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment against Abraham based on fraud, and against Gaddis for negligence in connection with a real estate deal. Reversed, with costs to defendants.

Shaw, through Gaddis, his real estate agency, sought to sell his farm and home, and 65 water shares. He had negotiated with Abraham for about two years. One Boyce, Gaddis' agent was an intermediary. Abraham insisted on clear title to the water stock, etc. A contract prepared by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases