1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 59 Wn.2d
  5. 59 Wn.2d 96 (1961)
 

IVERSON v. GRAHAM

No. 35880.

59 Wn.2d 96 (1961)

366 P.2d 213

VIRGINIA A. IVERSON, Respondent, v. WAYNE M. GRAHAM, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

November 9, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren Hardy and George Olson, for appellant.

Merges, Brain & Hilyer, by Gale P. Hilyer, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

[1] Experience dictated the use of the word "verbatim" in that portion of Rule on Appeal 43 (RCW Vol. 0), which reads:

"... No error assigned to any finding or findings of fact made or refused will be considered unless so much of the finding or findings as is claimed to be erroneous shall be set out verbatim in the brief...."

We can only repeat that verbatim means "verbatim." The assignments of error directed to the findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases