SCALZO v. MARSH


13 Wis.2d 126 (1961)

SCALZO, Appellant, v. MARSH, d/b/a SPOONER ELECTRIC SERVICE, and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 7, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Douglas, Omernik & Bitney of Spooner, and oral argument by E. E. Omernik.

For the respondent Don Marsh there was a brief by Cameron, Cameron & Shervey of Rice Lake, and oral argument by William A. Cameron.

For the respondent Skelly Oil Company there was a brief by Hughes, Anderson & Davis of Superior, and Sam C. Oliver of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and oral argument by J. L. Davis and by Harold Witkin of Superior.


CURRIE, J.

The issues on this appeal are:

(1) Should either or both of the jury's answers of "No" to the first two questions of the special verdict have been changed to "Yes" by the trial court?

(2) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in instructing the jury?

(3) Should a new trial be granted in order to have determined the issue of whether "continued servicing" of the gas system constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases