A.A. MURPHY, INC. v. BANFIELD

No. 39023.

363 P.2d 942 (1961)

A.A. MURPHY, INC., a foreign corporation, dba Murphy Finance Co., Plaintiff in Error, v. Frank BANFIELD, dba Banfield Sales, Vinson A. Bogard and Hazel M. Bogard, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 25, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Boatman, Pugsley & Boatman, Okmulgee, for plaintiff in error.

Smith, Inglish & Gray, Okmulgee, for defendants in error.


BERRY, Justice.

The agents of Frank Banfield, dba Banfield Sales, approached Mr. and Mrs. Bogard in an effort to solicit their participation in an "economy food plan". The selling point, as outlined by the agents, was that Banfield could substantially reduce Bogards' living expenses by undertaking to supply, at wholesale prices, their usual household needs for meats and vegetables over a period of two years. For the storage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases