BRUNO v. GOLDEN BELL DAIRY


15 Wis.2d 106 (1961)

BRUNO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOLDEN BELL DAIRY, Defendant and Respondent: AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Impleaded Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 28, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Maurice Schmerling of Kenosha, attorney, and N. Paley Phillips of Milwaukee of counsel.

For the respondent Golden Bell Dairy there was a brief by Whaley & Whaley of Racine, and oral argument by John W. Whaley and Vilas H. Whaley.

For the respondent American Surety Company of New York there was a brief by Phillips & Richards of Kenosha. and oral argument by David L. Phillips.


BROADFOOT, J.

The complaint alleged that the negligence of the driver consisted of failing to shake the snow from his boots before he entered the premises, thus allowing slush and snow to drip off his boots on the steps, making them slippery and unsafe; and that he failed to warn the plaintiff of the dangerous condition thereof.

In ruling upon the motion for a directed verdict it was the duty of the trial court to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases