HUNTER v. NESMITH

No. 38739.

358 P.2d 841 (1961)

C. W. HUNTER, Plaintiff in Error, v. Clinton NESMITH, d/b/a Nesmith Implement Company of Mangum, Oklahoma, and R. L. Hunter, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

January 10, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

King & Wadlington, by Carloss Wadlington, Ada, for plaintiff in error.

Arnett & McDaniel, by Hollis Arnett, Mangum, for defendant in error Clinton Nesmith.


HALLEY, Justice.

This is an action to set aside a judgment alleged to be void upon the face of the record, and that a judgment and order confirming the sale of real estate under the original judgment be vacated.

A clear understanding of the issues involved requires a review of the various proceedings leading up to the motion of C.W. Hunter, to set aside the judgment he is attacking as void upon the face of the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases