PITTERA v. PARADE PUB.


29 Misc.2d 90 (1961)

Dorothy H. Pittera, Plaintiff, v. Parade Publications, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

March 23, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (Edward N. Costikyan and Stanley Lubman of counsel), for defendants. Harry H. Lipsig for plaintiff.


THOMAS A. AURELIO, J.

The defendants, Parade Publications, Inc., Motley and Gorkin, move for a dismissal of each cause of action for legal insufficiency or, in the alternative, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order striking out paragraphs 27 and 28. They argue that plaintiff charges them with publishing an allegedly erroneous statement that the plaintiff had been married to a well-known executive, had terminated the relationship...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases