FOSTER v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY


227 F.Supp. 946 (1961)

Arthur FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES LINES COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

September 21, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Di Costanzo & Klonsky, Brooklyn, N. Y. (Robert Klonsky, Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City (Joseph M. Cunningham, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


MacMAHON, District Judge.

This is the defendant's second attempt to transfer this action to the Eastern District of South Carolina (Charleston Division), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a). Judge Kaufman denied the earlier motion in an opinion which gave careful consideration to all the relevant facts. Defendant, however, claims that it has now developed new facts warranting a different result from that reached by Judge Kaufman.

Opposing the earlier motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases