STATE v. EZOTO

No. 669.

116 Ohio App. 1 (1961)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. EZOTO, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Lake County.

Decided December 27, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Fred V. Skok, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Barry M. Byron, for appellee.

Mr. T. R. Zettlemeyer, for appellant.


BROWN, P. J.

This is an appeal from a sentence imposed by the Painesville Municipal Court, after a jury found the defendant, appellant herein, guilty of the charge of operating a vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of Section 4511.19, Revised Code.

It should be noted that this section of the Code defines two offenses. State v. Wilgus, 31 Ohio Opinions, 443. Defendant was charged only with operating.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases