1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 14 Wis.2d
  5. 14 Wis.2d 101 (1961)
 

BINO v. HURLEY

14 Wis.2d 101 (1961)

BINO and wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF HURLEY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 6, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Clarence V. Olson of Ashland, and Norlin & Spears of Washburn, and oral argument by Mr. Olson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Schmitt, Wurster & Tinglum of Merrill, and James E. Flandrena, city attorney of Hurley, and oral argument by Sverre O. Tinglum.

CURRIE, J.

The two issues presented on this appeal are:

(1) Was a public highway created under sec. 80.01 (2), Stats., with respect to the roadway by reason of work done on the same by the city for a period of ten years or more?

(2) Was a public highway created with respect to such roadway, including the spur, through adverse user?

Public Highway Under Sec. 80.01 (2), Stats.

Sec. 80.01 (2), Stats., provides in part, "All

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases