ANDERSON v. ANDERSON


30 Misc.2d 1034 (1961)

Concetta Anderson, Plaintiff, v. Henry R. Anderson, Defendant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens.

May 8, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fields, Zimmerman, Klopper, Skodnick & Segall (Harold C. Fields of counsel), for defendant. Fink, Weinberger, Levin & Gottschalk (Samuel G. Fredman of counsel), for plaintiff.


ABRAHAM R. MARGULIES, J.

"The function of summary judgment is to deal with issues and get at the real substance of the facts, about which there is no controversy which a judge could take seriously." (Tripp, Guide to Motion Practice, p. 277.) This well-established rule was enunciated in County Transp. Co. v. Maltbie (191 Misc. 391). The motion is determined on all of the pleadings (Bobrose Developments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases