1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 191 F.Supp.
  5. 191 F.Supp. 867 (1961)
 

APPLICATION OF RAINARD

Misc. No. 10.

191 F.Supp. 867 (1961)

Application of Leo W. RAINARD and Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

March 13, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Richards, Jr., Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Byerly, Townsend, Watson & Churchill, C. Blake Townsend, Carroll G. Harper, New York City, of counsel, for Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. and Leo W. Rainard.

Austin R. Miller and Henry N. Paul, Jr., Paul & Paul, Philadelphia, Pa., for Spunize Co. of America, Inc.

LEAHY, Senior District Judge.

1. Rainard, Bancroft's employee, was questioned on deposition on the degree of control Bancroft had over the North Carolina litigation. Spunize's counsel, at oral argument, stated, if answered, Rainard's testimony could be used in the North Carolina suit as admissions against Duplan. But only, I think, is this so if it has first been established that Bancroft is in control of the North Carolina...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases