1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 200 F.Supp.
  5. 200 F.Supp. 814 (1961)
 

AMALGAMATED DENTAL CO. v. LANG DENTAL MFG. CO.

No. 57 C 1130.

200 F.Supp. 814 (1961)

The AMALGAMATED DENTAL COMPANY, Limited and The L. D. Caulk Company, Plaintiffs, v. LANG DENTAL MFG. CO., Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

November 2, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee J. Gary, Chicago, Ill., Charles M. Thomas, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Frank J. Foley, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ROBSON, District Judge.

A separate trial was had on the issue of laches raised by Paragraph XVII of defendant's answer.1 After a careful study of the evidence and of the controlling precedent, the Court concludes that plaintiffs have not been guilty of laches, and that they took no action calculated to mislead defendant, upon which it relied to its prejudice.

The Wilding patent No. 2,249,694, in suit, concerns a material for taking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases