KRENDELL v. MOSCOW


23 Misc.2d 969 (1960)

George J. Krendell, Plaintiff, v. Alvin Moscow et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

April 1, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

House, Grossman, Vorhaus & Hemley (Leonard Hemley and Joseph F. Gelband of counsel), for Alvin Moscow, defendant.

Murray Rosen for plaintiff.


WILLIAM C. HECHT, JR., J.

Defendant Moscow moves pursuant to subdivision 7 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a dismissal of the second amended complaint. In dismissing the first amended complaint the court held (23 Misc.2d 968): "While plaintiff's compensation is stated in terms of profit sharing, there is nevertheless involved a simple contract resulting in a simple obligation to pay a sum of money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases