Per Curiam.
Under the circumstances of this case, the plaintiff was not estopped from holding the defendants individually liable to perform the covenants of the lease. No assumption agreement was ever executed by the corporation as provided for in the lease. The mere acceptance of rent paid on behalf of the corporation did not effect a substitution of the corporation as the tenant in the place of the defendants so as to relieve the latter from their covenant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
