1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 23 Misc.2d
  5. 23 Misc.2d 966 (1960)
 

CAMACHO v. BROOKLYN UNION GAS CO.

23 Misc.2d 966 (1960)

Patricia Camacho, Appellant, v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

January 20, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Delukey & Shapiro (Stanley Shapiro of counsel), for appellant. Cullen & Dykman (Charles J. Dadd, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The mere fact that there was a second examination, which was necessitated by the alleged lack of knowledge of the employee produced by defendant at the first examination, is not a legal ground for suppressing the first examination. If there is any question as to the accuracy of the transcript the witness involved may correct his testimony in the approved manner. (See Columbia v. Lee, 239 App. Div. 849; Leventhal v. Consolidated Carriers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases