DICKINSON v. PIERCE


23 Misc.2d 941 (1960)

Mabel Dickinson, Respondent, v. Annabelle Pierce, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

January 29, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

De Lukey & Shapiro (Stanley Shapiro of counsel), for appellant. Donald J. Turrell and Harold L. Weiss for respondent.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The conflicting assertions in the affidavits submitted by the parties on the motion on the question of service should not have been resolved without a hearing. (Krantz v. Salvio, 283 App. Div. 965; Raynor v. Steinfield, 261 App. Div. 929; Gaines v. Bryant Park Bldg., 28 N.Y.S.2d 215, motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied 263 App. Div. 876.)

The orders should be unanimously reversed and matter remitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases