BEAGLE v. BEAGLE

No. 35194.

55 Wn.2d 908 (1960)

349 P.2d 241

HELEN C. BEAGLE, Plaintiff, v. HARVEY L. BEAGLE, Defendant and Relator, THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR KING COUNTY, William J. Wilkins, Judge, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

February 4, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cartano, Botzer & Chapman (Robert A. O'Neill, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Zundel, Merges, Brain & Isaac, for defendant and relator.


PER CURIAM:

Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts from the record on appeal for the reason that it was not timely filed, in accordance with Rule on Appeal 34, RCW, Vol. 0. The proposed statement of facts was filed more than ninety days after entry of the decree. No application for extension of time for filing was filed within the ninety-day period, or at all. See Beagle v. Beagle, ante p. 174, 346 P.2d 689 (1959...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases