1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 179 Cal.App.2d
  5. 179 Cal.App.2d 782 (1960)
 

EASHMAN v. CITY & COUNTY OF S.F.

Docket No. 18539.

179 Cal.App.2d 782 (1960)

4 Cal. Rptr. 264

WILLIE B. EASHMAN, Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

April 18, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and John J. Taheny, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants.

William B. Acton and Rhoda Pemberton Acton for Respondent.

PAULSEN, J. pro tem.*

On January 20, 1948, Willie Eashman, respondent-petitioner, entered the employ of the San Francisco Municipal Railway and later was given the civil service classification "J66 Garageman — Permanent." That employment continued until April 5, 1957. Shortly after that date petitioner was served with a notice of hearing which stated: "You are charged with inattention to duties in that you were working on your own...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases