Petitioner moves against respondent for an order directing that arbitration proceed pursuant to contract entered into between the parties on March 4, 1953. Respondent in an affirmative defense set forth in its answer alleged that the "petition fails to state facts sufficient to institute a course of action" and moves to dismiss on that ground.
Petitioner charges respondent with breach of what has been called a "dual rate contract...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
