1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 23 Misc.2d
  5. 23 Misc.2d 924 (1960)
 

NORTON v. FELLO

23 Misc.2d 924 (1960)

Anne Norton, Respondent, v. Dolores Fello et al., Doing Business as Chic Beauty Salon, Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

January 29, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hampton & Dietel (William F. McNulty of counsel), for appellants. Wolinsky & Wolinsky (Melvin Wolinsky of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The theory of the action, as pleaded, was breach of warranty. The determination made below was based solely upon negligence. A new trial is required since the issues presented in the breach of warranty action were not considered or passed upon.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to defendants to abide the event.

Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases