1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 181 Cal.App.2d
  5. 181 Cal.App.2d 757 (1960)
 

CASE v. ALPERSON

Docket No. 24115.

181 Cal.App.2d 757 (1960)

5 Cal. Rptr. 635

CARROLL CASE, Respondent, v. LILLIAN R. ALPERSON et al., Defendants; EDWARD L. ALPERSON et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pacht, Ross, Warne & Bernhard, Stuart L. Kadison and Harvey M. Grossman for Appellants.

Daniel A. Weber and Paul Caruso for Respondent.

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

[1] Parties who stipulate in an agreement that controversies that may arise out of it shall be settled by arbitration, may expect not only to reap the advantages that flow from the use of that nontechnical, summary procedure, but also to find themselves bound by an award reached by paths neither marked nor traceable and not subject to judicial review. That is the situation in the case now before us, with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases