HECHT v. MANESS


23 Misc.2d 889 (1960)

Jacob J. Hecht, Respondent, v. Samuel Maness, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

April 1, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maness & Maness (Richard L. Levenson of counsel), for appellant. Emanuel B. Quint and Benjamin Hager for respondent.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, BENJAMIN and DALY, JJ.


Per Curiam.

A summary proceeding to recover possession of real property is not an action within the purview of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice but a special proceeding (People ex rel. Livermore v. Hamilton, 39 N.Y. 107; Handshke v. Loysen, 203 App. Div. 21; Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 1415, 1430, 1437, 1445) and summary judgment is not available therein on the issue of landlord's right to possession (905 West End Ave. Corp. v. Peers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases