1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 11 A.D.2d
  5. 11 A.D.2d 78 (1960)
 

MATTER OF CHOPAK

11 A.D.2d 78 (1960)

In the Matter of Julius Chopak (Also Known as Jules Chopak), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 30, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Gordon of counsel (Eric Nightingale, attorney), for petitioner.

Julius Chopak, respondent in person.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL, RABIN, VALENTE and STEVENS, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has moved to confirm the report of the Referee rendered after a lengthy hearing.

The Referee found that two of the three charges against respondent had been sustained. Briefly, the Referee concluded, and the evidence amply shows, that respondent, while acting as manager of two apartment houses in New York City, willfully and deliberately violated the rent regulations by receiving rent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases