1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 189 F.Supp.
  5. 189 F.Supp. 687 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. AMBURGEY

Crim. A. No. 146-60.

189 F.Supp. 687 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Calvin T. AMBURGEY, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

December 1, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., District of Columbia, Thomas M. O'Malley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Rolland G. Lamensdorf, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

This case, which presents several important questions in the administration of the Durham1 rule and the defense of insanity in District of Columbia criminal prosecutions,2 is before the Court in the form of an alternative motion by the defendant, Calvin T. Amburgey, for judgment of acquittal by reason of insanity,3 or for a new trial.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases