1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 182 Cal.App.2d
  5. 182 Cal.App.2d 687 (1960)
 

BEHNEMAN v. ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DIST.

Docket No. 19352.

182 Cal.App.2d 687 (1960)

6 Cal. Rptr. 382

STANLEY E. BEHNEMAN et al., Appellants, v. ALAMEDACONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin C. Hix for Appellants.

Robert E. Nisbet and Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe for Respondents.

BRAY, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon an order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

This action was brought by taxpayers to determine the validity of bonds issued by defendant transit district for a special transit service district.

1. Is the emergency clause in chapter 116 (Stats. 1959, p. 1967) valid?

2. Was the ordinance calling the bond election void?

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases