Appellant was a licensed operator and concededly was not employed for the principal purpose of operating a motor vehicle, and the vehicle which he operated was not in use as a public or common carrier of persons or property. Appellant contends, and the District Attorney agrees, that under the circumstances disclosed no violation of the statute then in effect was established. Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted. At the time...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.