Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This proceeding was erroneously treated by respondents as an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition states that the "proceeding is initiated under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act * * * to compel the herein designated respondents to perform the duties specifically enjoined by law." The petitioner claims that the Parole Board failed to give him a hearing as required by section 218 of the Correction Law before...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.