EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COM'N

Nos. 18022, 18120, 18124, 18125.

281 F.2d 567 (1960)

EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, and Southern Counties Gas Company of California, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. PEOPLE of the State OF CALIFORNIA and Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 30, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Bennett, Roderick B. Cassidy, Harold J. McCarthy, J. Calvin Simpson, San Francisco, Cal., for people of Cal. and Public Utilities Commission of Cal.

Leo E. Forquer, Atty., Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, F. P. C., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Gregory A. Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., Allen R. Grambling, El Paso, Tex., Malcolm T. Dungan, San Francisco, Cal., George D. Horning, Jr., Washington, D. C., Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., Hardie, Grambling, Sims & Galatzan, El Paso, Tex., Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C., for El Paso Natural Gas Co.

H. F. Lippitt, II, T. J. Reynolds, H. P. Letton, Jr., L. T. Rice, Milford Springer, Robert M. Olson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for Southern Cal. Gas Co. and Southern Counties Gas Co. of Cal.

Frederick T. Searls, Malcolm H. Furbush, Frederick W. Mielke, Jr., Malcolm A. MacKillop, San Francisco, Cal., for Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.

Before TUTTLE, CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing Denied in No. 18125. September 30, 1960.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

These petitions deal with the proper computation of the rate to be charged to the ultimate consumers of gas, principally residents of the State of California, for the period April 15, 1955-December 31, 1957, for gas produced and transmitted and sold by El Paso Natural Gas Company, an integrated Natural Gas Company.

Without expressly identifying the proponent of each separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases