APPLICATION OF ROSENTHAL-BLOCK CHINA CORPORATION


183 F.Supp. 659 (1960)

Application of ROSENTHAL-BLOCK CHINA CORPORATION et al., for an order restraining certain arbitrations attempted to be had by Rosenthal-Porzellan Aktiengesellschaft, Porzellanfabrik F. Thomas & Co., Porzellanfabrik Waldershof A.G. vormals Johann Haviland and Rosenthal Porzellanfabrik Selb Kunstabteilung, German corporations, and directing arbitration of any Noritake claim within the limits of the provisions of an agreement dated February 7, 1952, before the Arbitration Tribunal of the American Arbitration Association. Application of Raymond LOEWY et al. for an order restraining certain arbitration attempted to be had by Rosenthal-Porzellan Aktiengesellschaft, Rosenthal Porzellanfabrik Selb Kunstabteilung, Porzellanfabrik F. Thomas and Porzellanfabrik Waldershof A.G. vormals Johann Haviland, German corporations, before the Arbitration Tribunal of the American Arbitration Association and directing arbitration of any Noritake claim within the limits of the provisions of an agreement dated February 7, 1952.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for Rosenthal-Block China Corp., Simon H. Rifkin, Arthur L. Liman, New York City, of counsel.

Weisman, Celler, Allan, Spett & Sheinberg, New York City, for Steelmaster, Inc., Joseph Block, Dorothy Block and Irving Block, Morris Gutt, New York City, of counsel.

Spiro, Felstiner & Prager, New York City, for Rosenthal-Porzellan Aktiengesellschaft and others. William W. Prager, Philip Bloom, New York City, of counsel.

Allan D. Emil, New York City, for Raymond Loewy, A. Baker Barnhart, William T. Snaith, Jean Thompson Bienfait d/b/u the firm name and style of Raymond Loewy Associates. Melvin A. Albert, New York City, of counsel.


DIMOCK, District Judge.

These are motions to remand a case which had been removed to this court from the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The removal took place when a group of American corporations and individuals moved in the New York Supreme Court to stay arbitration proceedings which had been begun by a group of German corporations. The German group removed the court proceeding to this court. The American group's motion to remand is based on the contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases